研究と方法論
Research v2.0Version 2.0 · · Governance 2.0 public evidence surface
Governance 2.0 Overview
This page is part of the starnum public Governance 2.0 surface and uses the same evidence layer as the system card, data governance, transparency report, use policy, and security policy.
Governance Summary
This page documents the research operating model behind cultural interpretation, chart methodology, content quality, multilingual translation quality, and AI-assisted governance workflows.
Scope
Astrology-method notes, true-solar-time assumptions, knowledge-base and translation-memory lineage, AWR/TM quality gates, benchmark references, and public transparency artifacts.
Implementation Status
Version 2.0 turns the research page into a maintained evidence hub: claims point to machine-readable artifacts, while systems detect and agents decide whether content needs repair.
執筆スタンス：陸斌兆派を分析の基準に置き、他流派との差異を客観的に比較します。優劣の判定は行いません。
更新頻度：毎月 1 本自動公開（実装：
scripts/publish-research.js ）· RSS
陸斌兆派 四化の解釈差：戊干・庚干・壬干の三通りの読み方
紫微斗数で最も議論が分かれる論点のひとつ。戊干は右弼化科か、それとも天機化科か。庚干は太陰化科か、天同化科か。壬干は左輔化禄か、天梁化禄か。本稿では陸斌兆派、王亭之派、欽天四化の違いを文献ベースで整理します。
命理知識ベースへの GraphRAG 応用：星曜から宮位までの意味グラフ
総計 2,758 檔 1538K 行の命理知識ベースを Neo4j のグラフ（343 節點 / 679 關係）に変換し、Qdrant のベクトル検索と統合。三層の証拠融合による命盤分析系を実現しました。
117 條 命理ハードルールの設計：四化「ありえない事象」の境界定義
命理 AI の本当の難所は生成力ではなく、「ありえない命理事象」を口にさせないことです。本稿では 117 條 のハードルール（四化 41 + 格局 49 + 核心指標 17）の設計思想と実例を示します。
生命数秘 九宮グリッドの矢印系：台湾派と西洋ピタゴラス体系の違い
台湾で広く使われる「九宮格数秘」と、西洋 Pythagorean 体系では Arrow Lines の定義に明確な差があります。両者の計算方法を整理し、当サイトが採用した基準とその理由を述べます。
外部基準と一次資料
以下は本ページの判断に用いる一次資料です。比較基準であり、第三者による本サイトの推奨を意味しません。
Current Machine Audit Snapshot
This block uses only traceable local audit data. No unsupported metrics or model claims are added.
- data/state-machine/i18n-parity.json: 8,036 parent URLs, 7,976 articles.
- data/kb-machine-audit.json: 3,238 source files, 0 missing coverage, 0 orphan chunks.
- data/discovery-surface-audit.json: 0 errors, 0 warnings.
- data/sla-report.json: critical / 5 critical, 0 warnings.
Content Maintenance And Update Decision
This block makes governance-page content machine-checkable: every page must disclose its source artifacts, related pages, and the gate that reports update needs.
Update Decision
This is not static copy. When source artifacts, related policies, public metrics, or generators change, AI Ops reports evidence and an AI agent decides whether the page needs edits.
Human Boundary
Systems detect, report, and preserve machine-readable evidence. Codex/Claude agents perform final judgment and repair.
Verification Command
node scripts/verify-trust-pages.js --check
data/state-machine/public-bench.jsondata/kb-machine-audit.jsondata/public-claim-registry.json- Related governance pages: methodology · benchmark · System Card · Transparency Report
- Update flow:
npm run update:trust-pages→npm run test:trust
Verifiable Evidence Layer
This block is not a narrative claim. Each core assertion has a claim id, source JSON, hash, and a repeatable verification command. Public pages disclose governance evidence without exposing source code, secrets, private data, or exploitable attack details.
| Claim ID | Verifiable value | Status | Owner | Source and verification |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| claim.public-url-manifest.indexable-count Public URL and canonical inventory |
38,965 indexable URLs | verified | sitewide | node scripts/generate-public-evidence-manifest.js --dry |
| claim.trust-pages.audit-pass-rate Trust page machine audit |
180/180 pass | verified | sitewide | node scripts/verify-trust-pages.js --check |
| claim.discovery-surface.zero-errors AI discovery surface audit |
{"errors":0,"warnings":0} | verified | sitewide | node scripts/verify-discovery-surface.js |
| claim.structured-data.jsonld-errors JSON-LD / structured data audit |
{"structured_data_invalid_files":0,"breadcrumb_count":28274,"faq_count":27506,"dataset_count":30,"article_count":27406} | verified | sitewide | node scripts/site-machine-audit.js |
| claim.status.sla-state Status page SLA source |
critical / 5 critical, 0 warnings | verified | sitewide | node scripts/generate-status-page.js |
| claim.provider-alignment.openai-anthropic-gemini OpenAI / Anthropic / Google Gemini benchmark alignment |
benchmark alignment only unless code/config evidence exists | verified | sitewide | node scripts/verify-public-evidence.js --check |
| claim.transparency-report.sha256 Transparency report SHA-256 anchor |
{"report":"transparency/report-2026-Q3.json","sha256":"47b09e2ca4e8b8fe9dffdfaccef3b11212de9ee3a8a14badca8044e2481203c5"} | verified | sitewide | node scripts/update-transparency-current-data.js |
| claim.release-integrity.gpg-signing GPG signing status |
GPG signing configured locally; GitHub verification pending | github_verification_pending | sitewide | gpg --list-secret-keys --keyid-format=long && git log -1 --show-signature |
System Card V2.0: Technical Transparency Layer
This layer publishes the technical governance evidence that can be safely disclosed: architecture, data sources, AI-use boundaries, quality gates, release integrity, and provider alignment. Source code, secrets, exploitable attack details, and private data remain out of scope.
Public architecture
Cloudflare Pages/Workers, R2/D1/KV/Pagefind, and local generation scripts form the public-site and governance publication chain. Public pages disclose behavior, state, and traceable sources, not secrets or internal permissions.
AI-use disclosure
AI-assisted workflows are used for knowledge-base retrieval, cross-checking, and error detection. Governance documents are benchmarked against OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google Gemini public frameworks. Production model usage is disclosed only when code/config evidence exists.
Quality and safety gates
Governance page audit 180/180 passing, JSON-LD errors 0, discovery-surface errors 0. Status pages report critical / 5 critical, 0 warnings as-is.
Data traceability
Knowledge base 32,724 chunks, TM 789,031 entries, AI answer-ready 7,976/7,976. Public metrics trace to data/state-machine/*, data/*audit*.json, and transparency reports.
| Governance area | OpenAI | Anthropic | Google Gemini | Starnum implementation evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model/system-card disclosure | OpenAI models + safety docs | Claude model docs + system/model cards | Gemini model docs + safety settings | system-card, model-card, methodology, benchmark, transparency-log |
| Safety evaluation and use boundaries | Safety best practices / deployment checklist | Responsible Scaling / safety policy | Gemini safety controls / policy | AI safety, acceptable-use, ethics, risk-boundary copy, crawler policy audit |
| Data governance | Data controls / privacy controls | privacy and data handling docs | Gemini API data governance references | privacy, ai-data-governance, KB/TM source tracking, SHA-256 hashes |
| Monitoring and release | production checklist / eval discipline | system-card transparency discipline | model/version documentation discipline | deploy.js, status.html, SLA report, trust-pages-machine-audit, sitemap/hreflang audits |
- Sources: data/state-machine/model-card.json, public-bench.json, trust-pages.json, security-headers.json.
- Sources: data/trust-pages-machine-audit.json, data/discovery-surface-audit.json, data/ai-answer-readiness-audit.json.
- Sources: data/kb-machine-audit.json, data/tm/quality-audit-report.json, data/sla-report.json.
- Official benchmark docs checked: 2026-07-30; links are listed in the OpenAI / Anthropic / Google Gemini alignment table.
The V2.0 goal is not more claims; it separates implemented controls from planned controls. Production usage, benchmark alignment, status exceptions, GPG signing, and SLA breaches are disclosed from source data.
Release Integrity And GPG
GPG signing configured locally. signingkey=0934DFA0EDA6363A. GitHub verification pending until the public key upload and Verified badge are confirmed.
OpenAI / Anthropic / Google Gemini Alignment
The governance surface is benchmarked against the three public frameworks: model docs, system/model cards, safety evaluation, data governance, and use policies. This is benchmark alignment, not a claim that every provider is active in production inference. Official docs checked: 2026-07-30
| Provider | Governance focus | Starnum disclosure | Official source |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenAI | Model documentation, latest model notes, safety best practices, and data controls. | No verifiable production model setting was found in the production code scan; providers are listed as governance benchmarks. | https://platform.openai.com/docs/models |
| Anthropic | Claude model documentation, system/model cards, Responsible Scaling, and safety policy. | No verifiable production model setting was found in the production code scan; providers are listed as governance benchmarks. | https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/about-claude/models |
| Google Gemini | Gemini API model documentation, safety settings, data governance, and platform policy. | No verifiable production model setting was found in the production code scan; providers are listed as governance benchmarks. | https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/models |