← starnum.com.tw

システムカード

System Card v2.0

Version 2.0 · · Governance 2.0 public evidence surface

Governance 2.0 Overview

This page is part of the starnum public Governance 2.0 surface and uses the same evidence layer as the system card, data governance, transparency report, use policy, and security policy.

Governance Summary

This page is the canonical public system disclosure for platform behavior, model/provider boundaries, and evidence-backed governance.

Scope

System behavior, AI assistance boundaries, public claims, governance metrics, provider alignment, and release integrity.

Implementation Status

Version 2.0 is the source structure used to align the other public governance pages.

AI-Assisted Astrology Platform

バージョン2.0 · · OpenAI、Anthropic、Google Gemini の公開ガバナンス・フレームワークを参照

本システムカードは モデルカード を拡張し、starnum.com.tw プラットフォーム全体のシステム能力、知識ベース基盤、AI 支援パイプライン、品質保証、既知の制限を説明します。

1. システム概要

プラットフォーム名Starnum Platform
バージョンv5.0(2026-04-12)
主要機能紫微斗数命盤分析、生命霊数(ライフパス)計算、命理知識ベース記事
対象利用者伝統的東洋術数に関心のある繁体字中国語および多言語利用者
知識体系紫微:陸斌兆派(中州派)三合 + 四化;霊数:ピタゴラス体系
命盤エンジンiztro v3.x(オープンソース、GitHub で検証可能)
AI モデルClaude Sonnet 4.5(Anthropic)— 支援生成、人間によるレビュー
対応言語10 語言(zh-TW / zh-CN / en / ja / ko / es / vi / th / ms / id)
デプロイ基盤Cloudflare Pages + Workers + Supabase(PostgreSQL)

2. 知識ベース基盤

2.1 規模

紫微斗数 KB225+ ファイル、88 インデックス、8 巻構成(01-基礎 ~ 09-上級)
生命霊数 KB141 ファイル 約 56,544 行
KB 総規模2,758 檔1,537,711+ 行の構造化テキスト
ベクトル索引大規模語意ベクトルデータベース(Qdrant)
ナレッジグラフナレッジグラフ(Neo4j、星曜 × 宮位 × 四化)

2.2 知識品質グレード

2.3 流派完全性メカニズム

陸斌兆派以外の四化観点は ⚠️ 非陸斌兆派 とラベル付けされます。知識ベースはブロックリストを保持し、プロンプトインジェクションが検出されたソースの再クロールを防ぎます。

3. AI 支援パイプライン

3.1 命盤わかりやすい分析パイプライン

Layer A:命盤作成 — iztro オープンソースエンジンが Supabase から出生データを読み取り自動作成、手動入力禁止
Layer B:三層証拠融合 — Qdrant ベクトル検索 + Neo4j グラフ展開 + KB 精密スライシング、各観点に文献根拠を保証
Layer C:AI 支援生成 — Claude Sonnet 4.5 が 22 ブロック HTML 書式仕様に沿って平易な解釈草稿を生成、人間レビューへ
Layer D:自動検証117 條の命理ハードルール(四化不可能事象、格局条件、星曜廟陥)がエラーを自動ブロック
Layer E:人間レビュー — 命理研究者がレビュー後に Supabase へ書き込み、不合格は差し戻し

3.2 記事生産パイプライン

テーマ選定 — startup-check.js でギャップ分析、未カバーの 14 主星 × 12 宮位の組み合わせを優先
AI 支援執筆 — 19 の編集スキルパックに従い、KB 精密スライシングに基づき草稿生成
品質検証 — 232 項目・6 次元の自動 checklist(HTML 構造 / SEO / Schema / 内部リンク / 翻訳 / 広告)
四 AI 合同監査 — Claude / OpenAI / Anthropic / Google Gemini governance references が投票、過半数 FIX で修正実施
SHA256 完全性検証 — 各記事でコンテンツハッシュを計算し、公開後の改竄を防止

4. 品質保証メカニズム

4.1 六層クローズドループ品質モデル

  1. L1 出力層:記事ごとに 232 項目検証、失敗時は公開せず
  2. L2 エラー層:失敗ログ → 同種 ≥3 回で新ルールを自動提案
  3. L3 パフォーマンス層:GA4 + Cloudflare トラフィックからリフレッシュ対象記事を特定
  4. L4 メタルール層:rule-audit.js がルール体系自体を棚卸し、90 日未発火ルールを廃止
  5. L5 環境層:セキュリティヘッダ、依存脆弱性、証明書期限を自動監視
  6. L6 戦略層:四半期ごとの戦略レビュー、競合環境と照合

4.2 主要品質指標

命理ハードルール117 條四化 41 + 格局 49 + 核心指標 17 + 元規則 10
編集スキルモジュール19 スキルパック(prompts/skills/)
用語辞書221 用語 × 9 言語(glossary.json)
ケースライブラリ435 件(匿名化 + 検証済み)
自動品質検証232 項目 checklist(sop-checklist.md)

5. 制限と既知の境界

5.1 知識の制限

5.2 AI 支援の既知リスク

6. ガバナンスと更新

人間監督者mychenan(サイトオーナー、命理研究者)
AI 協働者Claude Sonnet 4.5 × 20(Anthropic)
合同監査バッチごと:Anthropic + OpenAI + Google Gemini governance benchmarks の四者投票
更新サイクルシステムカードは四半期ごと更新、重大な能力変更時は即時更新
公開文書方法論 / モデルカード / ベンチマーク / 倫理声明
ガバナンス文書治理文件 / 發展路線

お問い合わせ:Instagram @mychenan

外部基準と一次資料

以下は本ページの判断に用いる一次資料です。比較基準であり、第三者による本サイトの推奨を意味しません。

Current Machine Audit Snapshot

This block uses only traceable local audit data. No unsupported metrics or model claims are added.

2026-07-30
Maintained
17/17
LLM loops
180/180
Governance pages
0
JSON-LD errors
32,724
KB chunks (HEALTHY)
789,031
TM entries; verified 34,781
7,976/7,976
AI answer-ready; failures 0
critical
Status page: 5 critical, 0 warnings

Content Maintenance And Update Decision

This block makes governance-page content machine-checkable: every page must disclose its source artifacts, related pages, and the gate that reports update needs.

Update Decision

This is not static copy. When source artifacts, related policies, public metrics, or generators change, AI Ops reports evidence and an AI agent decides whether the page needs edits.

Human Boundary

Systems detect, report, and preserve machine-readable evidence. Codex/Claude agents perform final judgment and repair.

Verification Command

node scripts/verify-trust-pages.js --check

Verifiable Evidence Layer

This block is not a narrative claim. Each core assertion has a claim id, source JSON, hash, and a repeatable verification command. Public pages disclose governance evidence without exposing source code, secrets, private data, or exploitable attack details.

Claim IDVerifiable valueStatusOwnerSource and verification
claim.public-url-manifest.indexable-count
Public URL and canonical inventory
38,965 indexable URLs verified sitewide node scripts/generate-public-evidence-manifest.js --dry
claim.trust-pages.audit-pass-rate
Trust page machine audit
180/180 pass verified sitewide node scripts/verify-trust-pages.js --check
claim.discovery-surface.zero-errors
AI discovery surface audit
{"errors":0,"warnings":0} verified sitewide node scripts/verify-discovery-surface.js
claim.structured-data.jsonld-errors
JSON-LD / structured data audit
{"structured_data_invalid_files":0,"breadcrumb_count":28274,"faq_count":27506,"dataset_count":30,"article_count":27406} verified sitewide node scripts/site-machine-audit.js
claim.status.sla-state
Status page SLA source
critical / 5 critical, 0 warnings verified sitewide node scripts/generate-status-page.js
claim.provider-alignment.openai-anthropic-gemini
OpenAI / Anthropic / Google Gemini benchmark alignment
benchmark alignment only unless code/config evidence exists verified sitewide node scripts/verify-public-evidence.js --check
claim.transparency-report.sha256
Transparency report SHA-256 anchor
{"report":"transparency/report-2026-Q3.json","sha256":"47b09e2ca4e8b8fe9dffdfaccef3b11212de9ee3a8a14badca8044e2481203c5"} verified sitewide node scripts/update-transparency-current-data.js
claim.release-integrity.gpg-signing
GPG signing status
GPG signing configured locally; GitHub verification pending github_verification_pending sitewide gpg --list-secret-keys --keyid-format=long && git log -1 --show-signature
claim.system-card.production-model-evidence
Production model setting source scan
{"productionModelEvidence":[]} verified system-card node scripts/verify-public-evidence.js --check
claim.system-card.quality-gates
System card machine quality gates
{"trustPages":{"pages":180,"pass":180,"fail":0},"discovery":{"errors":0,"warnings":0},"structuredData":{"structured_data_invalid_files":0,"breadcrumb_count":28274,"faq_count":27506 verified system-card node scripts/verify-trust-pages.js --check && node scripts/verify-discovery-surface.js
claim.system-card.kb-tm-lineage
KB / TM source lineage
{"kb":{"source_files":3238,"chunks":32724,"chunked_source_files":3238,"excluded_source_files":0,"missing_chunk_coverage":0,"orphan_chunks":0},"tm":{"total_entries":789031,"counts": verified system-card node scripts/verify-public-evidence.js --check
claim.system-card.provider-benchmark-scope
Provider benchmark scope separated from production usage
{"benchmarkProviders":["OpenAI","Anthropic","Google Gemini"],"productionModelEvidence":[]} verified system-card node scripts/verify-public-evidence.js --check

System Card V2.0: Technical Transparency Layer

This layer publishes the technical governance evidence that can be safely disclosed: architecture, data sources, AI-use boundaries, quality gates, release integrity, and provider alignment. Source code, secrets, exploitable attack details, and private data remain out of scope.

Public architecture

Cloudflare Pages/Workers, R2/D1/KV/Pagefind, and local generation scripts form the public-site and governance publication chain. Public pages disclose behavior, state, and traceable sources, not secrets or internal permissions.

AI-use disclosure

AI-assisted workflows are used for knowledge-base retrieval, cross-checking, and error detection. Governance documents are benchmarked against OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google Gemini public frameworks. Production model usage is disclosed only when code/config evidence exists.

Quality and safety gates

Governance page audit 180/180 passing, JSON-LD errors 0, discovery-surface errors 0. Status pages report critical / 5 critical, 0 warnings as-is.

Data traceability

Knowledge base 32,724 chunks, TM 789,031 entries, AI answer-ready 7,976/7,976. Public metrics trace to data/state-machine/*, data/*audit*.json, and transparency reports.

Governance areaOpenAIAnthropicGoogle GeminiStarnum implementation evidence
Model/system-card disclosureOpenAI models + safety docsClaude model docs + system/model cardsGemini model docs + safety settingssystem-card, model-card, methodology, benchmark, transparency-log
Safety evaluation and use boundariesSafety best practices / deployment checklistResponsible Scaling / safety policyGemini safety controls / policyAI safety, acceptable-use, ethics, risk-boundary copy, crawler policy audit
Data governanceData controls / privacy controlsprivacy and data handling docsGemini API data governance referencesprivacy, ai-data-governance, KB/TM source tracking, SHA-256 hashes
Monitoring and releaseproduction checklist / eval disciplinesystem-card transparency disciplinemodel/version documentation disciplinedeploy.js, status.html, SLA report, trust-pages-machine-audit, sitemap/hreflang audits

The V2.0 goal is not more claims; it separates implemented controls from planned controls. Production usage, benchmark alignment, status exceptions, GPG signing, and SLA breaches are disclosed from source data.

Release Integrity And GPG

GPG signing configured locally. signingkey=0934DFA0EDA6363A. GitHub verification pending until the public key upload and Verified badge are confirmed.

OpenAI / Anthropic / Google Gemini Alignment

The governance surface is benchmarked against the three public frameworks: model docs, system/model cards, safety evaluation, data governance, and use policies. This is benchmark alignment, not a claim that every provider is active in production inference. Official docs checked: 2026-07-30

ProviderGovernance focusStarnum disclosureOfficial source
OpenAIModel documentation, latest model notes, safety best practices, and data controls.No verifiable production model setting was found in the production code scan; providers are listed as governance benchmarks.https://platform.openai.com/docs/models
AnthropicClaude model documentation, system/model cards, Responsible Scaling, and safety policy.No verifiable production model setting was found in the production code scan; providers are listed as governance benchmarks.https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/about-claude/models
Google GeminiGemini API model documentation, safety settings, data governance, and platform policy.No verifiable production model setting was found in the production code scan; providers are listed as governance benchmarks.https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/models