← starnum.com.tw

透明性ログ

透明性ログ
バージョン 1.0 — 作成：2026-04-12 | 機械可読：/data/transparency-log.json
方法論 倫理声明 セキュリティポリシー AI安全方法論 システム状態

starnum.com.tw はシステムイベント、品質問題、改善措置を公開かつ透明に記録することを約束します。このページはOpenAI Postmortem、Google Transparency Report、Anthropic Usage Policy Violation Summariesの透明性基準に準拠しています。

透明性への取り組み 本サイトは完全AI自動化で運営されています（Claude Codeが技術責任者）。問題を公開記録することが信頼構築の基本だと信じます。

現在のシステム状態

サービス状態最終確認
コンテンツ生産システム正常稼働2026-04-12
命盤分析サービス正常稼働2026-04-12
知識ベース（KB）インデックス正常稼働2026-04-12
4 AI 連合監査正常稼働（R15 4/4 CLEAN）2026-04-12
Supabase データベース正常稼働2026-04-12
Cloudflare CDN正常稼働2026-04-12
Neo4j 知識グラフ正常稼働（343ノード/681関係）2026-04-12
Qdrant ベクトル検索正常稼働（12,378チャンク）2026-04-12

インシデント記録（2026年）

記録済みインシデント 1件 | 進行中 0件 | 全重大インシデント 72時間以内に公開

2026-04-10 MINOR 解決済み 命盤分析

INC-2026-001：平易な言葉の出力フォーマット違反

重要度：低（品質問題、データ損失・セキュリティ問題ではない）

影響：AIエージェントが命盤分析で非標準フォーマット（【タイトル】形式 + 短すぎる説明タグ）を使用し、一部出力がフォーマット仕様に違反しました。

根本原因：エージェントが必要なanalysis-output-spec.mdスキルパックを読まず、記憶にある古いフォーマットテンプレートに依存しました。

緩和措置：

解決時間：2026-04-10（当日解決）

✅

他に重大インシデントの記録はありません。
記録がないことはメカニズムがないことを意味しません — システムが正常に動作していることを意味します。

インシデント分類と対応時間

重要度定義開示期限解決期限
CRITICALユーザーデータ漏洩、完全なサービス停止、セキュリティ脆弱性4時間以内24時間以内
MAJORコア機能障害、命盤分析エラー率>5%24時間以内72時間以内
MINOR品質低下、フォーマット問題、単一機能障害7日以内30日以内
INFOシステム最適化、予防的メンテナンス月次サマリースケジュール通り

関連ページ

外部基準と一次資料

以下は本ページの判断に用いる一次資料です。比較基準であり、第三者による本サイトの推奨を意味しません。

Current Machine Audit Snapshot

This block uses only traceable local audit data. No unsupported metrics or model claims are added.

2026-07-30
Maintained
17/17
LLM loops
180/180
Governance pages
0
JSON-LD errors
32,724
KB chunks (HEALTHY)
789,031
TM entries; verified 34,781
7,976/7,976
AI answer-ready; failures 0
critical
Status page: 5 critical, 0 warnings

Verifiable Evidence Layer

This block is not a narrative claim. Each core assertion has a claim id, source JSON, hash, and a repeatable verification command. Public pages disclose governance evidence without exposing source code, secrets, private data, or exploitable attack details.

Claim IDVerifiable valueStatusOwnerSource and verification
claim.public-url-manifest.indexable-count
Public URL and canonical inventory		 38,965 indexable URLs verified sitewide node scripts/generate-public-evidence-manifest.js --dry
claim.trust-pages.audit-pass-rate
Trust page machine audit		 180/180 pass verified sitewide node scripts/verify-trust-pages.js --check
claim.discovery-surface.zero-errors
AI discovery surface audit		 {"errors":0,"warnings":0} verified sitewide node scripts/verify-discovery-surface.js
claim.structured-data.jsonld-errors
JSON-LD / structured data audit		 {"structured_data_invalid_files":0,"breadcrumb_count":28274,"faq_count":27506,"dataset_count":30,"article_count":27406} verified sitewide node scripts/site-machine-audit.js
claim.status.sla-state
Status page SLA source		 critical / 5 critical, 0 warnings verified sitewide node scripts/generate-status-page.js
claim.provider-alignment.openai-anthropic-gemini
OpenAI / Anthropic / Google Gemini benchmark alignment		 benchmark alignment only unless code/config evidence exists verified sitewide node scripts/verify-public-evidence.js --check
claim.transparency-report.sha256
Transparency report SHA-256 anchor		 {"report":"transparency/report-2026-Q3.json","sha256":"47b09e2ca4e8b8fe9dffdfaccef3b11212de9ee3a8a14badca8044e2481203c5"} verified sitewide node scripts/update-transparency-current-data.js
claim.release-integrity.gpg-signing
GPG signing status		 GPG signing configured locally; GitHub verification pending github_verification_pending sitewide gpg --list-secret-keys --keyid-format=long && git log -1 --show-signature
claim.transparency-log.report-hash
Latest transparency report hash anchor		 {"report":"transparency/report-2026-Q3.json","sha256":"47b09e2ca4e8b8fe9dffdfaccef3b11212de9ee3a8a14badca8044e2481203c5"} verified transparency-log node scripts/update-transparency-current-data.js
claim.transparency-log.gpg-state
GPG state disclosure		 GPG signing configured locally; GitHub verification pending github_verification_pending transparency-log gpg --list-secret-keys --keyid-format=long && git log -1 --show-signature
claim.transparency-log.discovery-surface
Discovery surface verification state		 {"errors":0,"warnings":0} verified transparency-log node scripts/verify-discovery-surface.js
public-evidence-manifest.json public-claim-registry.json public-verification-report.json public-url-manifest.json

System Card V2.0: Technical Transparency Layer

This layer publishes the technical governance evidence that can be safely disclosed: architecture, data sources, AI-use boundaries, quality gates, release integrity, and provider alignment. Source code, secrets, exploitable attack details, and private data remain out of scope.

Public architecture

Cloudflare Pages/Workers, R2/D1/KV/Pagefind, and local generation scripts form the public-site and governance publication chain. Public pages disclose behavior, state, and traceable sources, not secrets or internal permissions.

AI-use disclosure

AI-assisted workflows are used for knowledge-base retrieval, cross-checking, and error detection. Governance documents are benchmarked against OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google Gemini public frameworks. Production model usage is disclosed only when code/config evidence exists.

Quality and safety gates

Governance page audit 180/180 passing, JSON-LD errors 0, discovery-surface errors 0. Status pages report critical / 5 critical, 0 warnings as-is.

Data traceability

Knowledge base 32,724 chunks, TM 789,031 entries, AI answer-ready 7,976/7,976. Public metrics trace to data/state-machine/*, data/*audit*.json, and transparency reports.

Governance areaOpenAIAnthropicGoogle GeminiStarnum implementation evidence
Model/system-card disclosureOpenAI models + safety docsClaude model docs + system/model cardsGemini model docs + safety settingssystem-card, model-card, methodology, benchmark, transparency-log
Safety evaluation and use boundariesSafety best practices / deployment checklistResponsible Scaling / safety policyGemini safety controls / policyAI safety, acceptable-use, ethics, risk-boundary copy, crawler policy audit
Data governanceData controls / privacy controlsprivacy and data handling docsGemini API data governance referencesprivacy, ai-data-governance, KB/TM source tracking, SHA-256 hashes
Monitoring and releaseproduction checklist / eval disciplinesystem-card transparency disciplinemodel/version documentation disciplinedeploy.js, status.html, SLA report, trust-pages-machine-audit, sitemap/hreflang audits

The V2.0 goal is not more claims; it separates implemented controls from planned controls. Production usage, benchmark alignment, status exceptions, GPG signing, and SLA breaches are disclosed from source data.

Release Integrity And GPG

GPG signing configured locally. signingkey=0934DFA0EDA6363A. GitHub verification pending until the public key upload and Verified badge are confirmed.

OpenAI / Anthropic / Google Gemini Alignment

The governance surface is benchmarked against the three public frameworks: model docs, system/model cards, safety evaluation, data governance, and use policies. This is benchmark alignment, not a claim that every provider is active in production inference. Official docs checked: 2026-07-30

ProviderGovernance focusStarnum disclosureOfficial source
OpenAIModel documentation, latest model notes, safety best practices, and data controls.No verifiable production model setting was found in the production code scan; providers are listed as governance benchmarks.https://platform.openai.com/docs/models
AnthropicClaude model documentation, system/model cards, Responsible Scaling, and safety policy.No verifiable production model setting was found in the production code scan; providers are listed as governance benchmarks.https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/about-claude/models
Google GeminiGemini API model documentation, safety settings, data governance, and platform policy.No verifiable production model setting was found in the production code scan; providers are listed as governance benchmarks.https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/models