Pernyataan Etika
Ethics Statement v2.0Version 2.0 · · Governance 2.0 public evidence surface
Governance 2.0 Overview
This page is part of the starnum public Governance 2.0 surface and uses the same evidence layer as the system card, data governance, transparency report, use policy, and security policy.
Governance Summary
This page states the ethical commitments behind astrology analysis, AI assistance, and public communication.
Scope
User autonomy, anti-deterministic language, non-discrimination, vulnerable-user boundaries, and transparent correction practices.
Implementation Status
Version 2.0 connects ethical claims to repeatable audit data instead of leaving them as static principles.
starnum.com.tw menggabungkan pengetahuan budaya astrologi dengan teknologi AI modern. Kami menyadari bahwa perpaduan ini membawa tanggung jawab yang nyata, sehingga kami berkomitmen untuk menjaga transparansi, akuntabilitas, dan mengutamakan kesejahteraan pengguna sepanjang proses. Pernyataan ini menjelaskan sikap etis kami serta mekanisme praktis di balik analisis astrologi yang dibantu AI.
1. Prinsip Etika Inti
2. Komitmen Spesifik Terkait Penggunaan AI
| Komitmen | Implementasi |
|---|---|
| AI tidak menyamar sebagai manusia | Seluruh konten yang dihasilkan dengan bantuan AI ditandai; halaman pembacaan dalam bahasa sehari-hari menjelaskan alur analisis secara eksplisit |
| Validasi silang antar model | Logika astrologi divalidasi secara otomatis oleh 117 aturan keras; audit gabungan rujukan tadbir urus AI berbilang penyedia menangkap bias sistemik |
| Perlindungan terhadap bias | Sudut pandang non-aliran Lu Binzhao di dalam basis pengetahuan ditandai dengan ⚠️ untuk mencegah penyebaran bias aliran yang tidak dideklarasikan |
| Larangan konten menakut-nakuti | Filter kata terlarang secara otomatis memblokir bahasa yang bersifat ancaman seperti "pasti ada bencana" atau "harus segera mengubah nasib" |
| Desain perlindungan privasi | Penyusunan bagan tidak memerlukan nama asli; data kelahiran tetap berada di penyimpanan terlindungi; pencarian publik dihentikan setelah kedaluwarsa atau dihapus dari akses oleh pengguna |
| Keteralasanan | Setiap pembacaan dapat dilacak hingga sumber KB tertentu sehingga mendukung verifikasi terbalik |
3. Hal-Hal yang Tidak Memenuhi Standar Etika Platform Ini
- Memprediksi peristiwa negatif spesifik seperti kematian, penyakit, atau tindak kriminal
- Memberikan analisis bagan individual kepada anak di bawah umur tanpa persetujuan wali
- Menggunakan informasi astrologi untuk segala bentuk diskriminasi
- Menyajikan hasil yang dihasilkan AI sebagai wawasan pribadi "peramal sakti"
- Memanfaatkan astrologi untuk menumbuhkan ketergantungan psikologis demi membenarkan biaya yang tinggi
- Menerbitkan kritik berbasis bagan terhadap tokoh politik atau individu kontroversial
4. Mekanisme Perbaikan Mandiri
Kami menjalankan sistem perbaikan kualitas loop tertutup untuk memastikan standar etika terus ditegakkan:
- Log kegagalan (failure-log.json): ketika masalah sejenis terjadi 3 kali atau lebih, aturan baru diusulkan secara otomatis
- Audit gabungan rujukan tadbir urus AI berbilang penyedia: Anthropic / OpenAI / Google Gemini governance benchmarks harus memberikan suara untuk mengonfirmasi masalah kualitas sebelum perbaikan diterapkan
- Tinjauan etika independen: dalam tinjauan lima departemen setiap hari Senin, departemen etika memegang hak veto tertinggi
- Prioritas penyelesaian konflik: Etika > kualitas konten > logika astrologi > SEO > teknis
5. Keselarasan dengan Kerangka Etika Internasional
Kerangka etika kami mengacu pada standar internasional berikut:
- Anthropic Responsible Scaling Policy: pengawasan manusia, transparansi, perlindungan terhadap penggunaan berbahaya
- EU AI Act (rancangan): persyaratan peninjauan manusia untuk sistem AI berisiko tinggi
- Prinsip Partnership on AI: keadilan dan ketertelusuran sistem AI
Analisis astrologi tidak termasuk dalam kategori sistem AI berisiko tinggi (tidak memengaruhi keputusan medis, pekerjaan, atau kredit), tetapi kami memilih untuk tetap menerapkan standar transparansi yang setara ketatnya.
6. Pengungkapan Konflik Kepentingan (Conflict of Interest Disclosure)
Keterbukaan adalah nilai inti situs ini, sehingga kami mengungkapkan hubungan kepentingan berikut dengan jelas agar pengguna dapat menilai sendiri objektivitas konten:
- Tujuan komersial: starnum.com.tw adalah situs dengan tujuan komersial, dan pemilik situs memiliki kepentingan finansial langsung terhadap trafik dan peringkat situs. Hal ini dapat memengaruhi prioritas topik, tetapi tidak memengaruhi akurasi konten astrologi (logika astrologi divalidasi secara otomatis oleh aturan keras, terlepas dari kepentingan komersial).
- Ketergantungan pada perangkat AI: situs ini menggunakan Anthropic Claude API sebagai teknologi intinya. Kami tidak memiliki kemitraan komersial atau afiliasi dengan Anthropic maupun perusahaan AI lainnya; biaya mengikuti tagihan API standar.
- Posisi aliran astrologi: situs ini secara eksplisit mengadopsi aliran Lu Binzhao (aliran Zhongzhou) dan bersikap netral terhadap aliran lain (Wang Tingzhi, Qintian Si Hua), tanpa merendahkan aliran mana pun.
- Tanpa konten bersponsor: kami tidak menerima penempatan promosi berbayar atas layanan atau produk yang berkaitan dengan astrologi; iklan berasal dari jaringan iklan pihak ketiga (tidak memengaruhi pemilihan konten).
- Tanpa pendanaan eksternal: tanpa investor eksternal, tanpa dana institusional, tanpa bantuan pemerintah. Dikelola sepenuhnya oleh individu.
Pengungkapan ini mengacu pada bagian COI di OpenAI Charter, praktik pengungkapan Anthropic Long-Term Benefit Trust, serta standar pernyataan konflik kepentingan pada artikel akademis.
7. Kontak
Jika Anda memiliki pertanyaan atau kekhawatiran mengenai pernyataan etika ini atau cara situs ini menggunakan AI, silakan hubungi:
- Pertanyaan umum dan kekhawatiran etika: Instagram @mychenan
- Pelaporan masalah: kirim pesan melalui Instagram @mychenan (kesalahan konten, masalah fungsional, kekhawatiran privasi)
Standar eksternal dan sumber primer
Sumber primer berikut menjadi acuan halaman ini. Ini adalah tolok ukur, bukan dukungan pihak ketiga terhadap situs ini.
Current Machine Audit Snapshot
This block uses only traceable local audit data. No unsupported metrics or model claims are added.
- data/state-machine/i18n-parity.json: 8,036 parent URLs, 7,976 articles.
- data/kb-machine-audit.json: 3,238 source files, 0 missing coverage, 0 orphan chunks.
- data/discovery-surface-audit.json: 0 errors, 0 warnings.
- data/sla-report.json: critical / 5 critical, 0 warnings.
Content Maintenance And Update Decision
This block makes governance-page content machine-checkable: every page must disclose its source artifacts, related pages, and the gate that reports update needs.
Update Decision
This is not static copy. When source artifacts, related policies, public metrics, or generators change, AI Ops reports evidence and an AI agent decides whether the page needs edits.
Human Boundary
Systems detect, report, and preserve machine-readable evidence. Codex/Claude agents perform final judgment and repair.
Verification Command
node scripts/verify-trust-pages.js --check
data/public-claim-registry.jsondata/ai-answer-readiness-audit.jsondata/state-machine/trust-pages.json- Related governance pages: Responsible AI · Acceptable Use Policy · Privacy Policy · AI Safety
- Update flow:
npm run update:trust-pages→npm run test:trust
Verifiable Evidence Layer
This block is not a narrative claim. Each core assertion has a claim id, source JSON, hash, and a repeatable verification command. Public pages disclose governance evidence without exposing source code, secrets, private data, or exploitable attack details.
| Claim ID | Verifiable value | Status | Owner | Source and verification |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| claim.public-url-manifest.indexable-count Public URL and canonical inventory |
38,965 indexable URLs | verified | sitewide | node scripts/generate-public-evidence-manifest.js --dry |
| claim.trust-pages.audit-pass-rate Trust page machine audit |
180/180 pass | verified | sitewide | node scripts/verify-trust-pages.js --check |
| claim.discovery-surface.zero-errors AI discovery surface audit |
{"errors":0,"warnings":0} | verified | sitewide | node scripts/verify-discovery-surface.js |
| claim.structured-data.jsonld-errors JSON-LD / structured data audit |
{"structured_data_invalid_files":0,"breadcrumb_count":28274,"faq_count":27506,"dataset_count":30,"article_count":27406} | verified | sitewide | node scripts/site-machine-audit.js |
| claim.status.sla-state Status page SLA source |
critical / 5 critical, 0 warnings | verified | sitewide | node scripts/generate-status-page.js |
| claim.provider-alignment.openai-anthropic-gemini OpenAI / Anthropic / Google Gemini benchmark alignment |
benchmark alignment only unless code/config evidence exists | verified | sitewide | node scripts/verify-public-evidence.js --check |
| claim.transparency-report.sha256 Transparency report SHA-256 anchor |
{"report":"transparency/report-2026-Q3.json","sha256":"47b09e2ca4e8b8fe9dffdfaccef3b11212de9ee3a8a14badca8044e2481203c5"} | verified | sitewide | node scripts/update-transparency-current-data.js |
| claim.release-integrity.gpg-signing GPG signing status |
GPG signing configured locally; GitHub verification pending | github_verification_pending | sitewide | gpg --list-secret-keys --keyid-format=long && git log -1 --show-signature |
System Card V2.0: Technical Transparency Layer
This layer publishes the technical governance evidence that can be safely disclosed: architecture, data sources, AI-use boundaries, quality gates, release integrity, and provider alignment. Source code, secrets, exploitable attack details, and private data remain out of scope.
Public architecture
Cloudflare Pages/Workers, R2/D1/KV/Pagefind, and local generation scripts form the public-site and governance publication chain. Public pages disclose behavior, state, and traceable sources, not secrets or internal permissions.
AI-use disclosure
AI-assisted workflows are used for knowledge-base retrieval, cross-checking, and error detection. Governance documents are benchmarked against OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google Gemini public frameworks. Production model usage is disclosed only when code/config evidence exists.
Quality and safety gates
Governance page audit 180/180 passing, JSON-LD errors 0, discovery-surface errors 0. Status pages report critical / 5 critical, 0 warnings as-is.
Data traceability
Knowledge base 32,724 chunks, TM 789,031 entries, AI answer-ready 7,976/7,976. Public metrics trace to data/state-machine/*, data/*audit*.json, and transparency reports.
| Governance area | OpenAI | Anthropic | Google Gemini | Starnum implementation evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model/system-card disclosure | OpenAI models + safety docs | Claude model docs + system/model cards | Gemini model docs + safety settings | system-card, model-card, methodology, benchmark, transparency-log |
| Safety evaluation and use boundaries | Safety best practices / deployment checklist | Responsible Scaling / safety policy | Gemini safety controls / policy | AI safety, acceptable-use, ethics, risk-boundary copy, crawler policy audit |
| Data governance | Data controls / privacy controls | privacy and data handling docs | Gemini API data governance references | privacy, ai-data-governance, KB/TM source tracking, SHA-256 hashes |
| Monitoring and release | production checklist / eval discipline | system-card transparency discipline | model/version documentation discipline | deploy.js, status.html, SLA report, trust-pages-machine-audit, sitemap/hreflang audits |
- Sources: data/state-machine/model-card.json, public-bench.json, trust-pages.json, security-headers.json.
- Sources: data/trust-pages-machine-audit.json, data/discovery-surface-audit.json, data/ai-answer-readiness-audit.json.
- Sources: data/kb-machine-audit.json, data/tm/quality-audit-report.json, data/sla-report.json.
- Official benchmark docs checked: 2026-07-30; links are listed in the OpenAI / Anthropic / Google Gemini alignment table.
The V2.0 goal is not more claims; it separates implemented controls from planned controls. Production usage, benchmark alignment, status exceptions, GPG signing, and SLA breaches are disclosed from source data.
Release Integrity And GPG
GPG signing configured locally. signingkey=0934DFA0EDA6363A. GitHub verification pending until the public key upload and Verified badge are confirmed.
OpenAI / Anthropic / Google Gemini Alignment
The governance surface is benchmarked against the three public frameworks: model docs, system/model cards, safety evaluation, data governance, and use policies. This is benchmark alignment, not a claim that every provider is active in production inference. Official docs checked: 2026-07-30
| Provider | Governance focus | Starnum disclosure | Official source |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenAI | Model documentation, latest model notes, safety best practices, and data controls. | No verifiable production model setting was found in the production code scan; providers are listed as governance benchmarks. | https://platform.openai.com/docs/models |
| Anthropic | Claude model documentation, system/model cards, Responsible Scaling, and safety policy. | No verifiable production model setting was found in the production code scan; providers are listed as governance benchmarks. | https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/about-claude/models |
| Google Gemini | Gemini API model documentation, safety settings, data governance, and platform policy. | No verifiable production model setting was found in the production code scan; providers are listed as governance benchmarks. | https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/models |