← starnum.com.tw

Kartu Sistem

System Card v2.0

Version 2.0 · · Governance 2.0 public evidence surface

Governance 2.0 Overview

This page is part of the starnum public Governance 2.0 surface and uses the same evidence layer as the system card, data governance, transparency report, use policy, and security policy.

Governance Summary

This page is the canonical public system disclosure for platform behavior, model/provider boundaries, and evidence-backed governance.

Scope

System behavior, AI assistance boundaries, public claims, governance metrics, provider alignment, and release integrity.

Implementation Status

Version 2.0 is the source structure used to align the other public governance pages.

AI-Assisted Astrology Platform

Versi 1.0 · · Mengacu pada kerangka Anthropic System Card

Kartu Sistem ini memperluas Kartu Model dan menjelaskan kemampuan sistem menyeluruh starnum.com.tw, infrastruktur basis pengetahuan, pipeline berbantuan AI, mekanisme jaminan mutu, dan batasan yang diketahui.

1. Ringkasan Sistem

Nama PlatformStarnum Platform
Versiv5.0 (2026-04-12)
Fitur UtamaAnalisis peta Zi Wei Dou Shu, kalkulasi Numerologi (Life Path), artikel basis pengetahuan astrologi
Target PenggunaPeminat metafisika Timur tradisional; pengguna bahasa Tionghoa Tradisional dan multibahasa
Sistem PengetahuanZi Wei: aliran Lu Binzhao (Zhongzhou) San-He + Si-Hua; Numerologi: sistem Pythagoras
Mesin Petaiztro v3.x (open source, dapat diverifikasi di GitHub)
Model AIClaude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic) — generasi berbantuan, ditinjau manusia
Bahasa Didukung10 bahasa (zh-TW / zh-CN / en / ja / ko / es / vi / th / ms / id)
InfrastrukturCloudflare Pages + Workers + Supabase (PostgreSQL)

2. Infrastruktur Basis Pengetahuan

2.1 Skala

KB Zi Wei Dou Shu225+ file, 88 indeks, struktur 8 jilid (01-dasar ~ 09-lanjutan)
KB Numerologi141 file ~56.544 baris
Total KB2.758 file ~1.537.711+ baris teks terstruktur
Indeks VektorBasis data vektor semantik berskala besar (Qdrant)
Graf PengetahuanGraf pengetahuan (Neo4j, bintang × istana × Si-Hua)

2.2 Peringkat Mutu Pengetahuan

2.3 Mekanisme Integritas Aliran

Pandangan Si-Hua non-Lu-Binzhao diberi label ⚠️ Non-Lu-Binzhao. KB memelihara daftar blokir untuk mencegah perayapan ulang sumber yang terdeteksi prompt injection.

3. Pipeline Berbantuan AI

3.1 Pipeline Analisis Peta dalam Bahasa Jelas

Layer A: Penyusunan Peta — Mesin sumber terbuka iztro membaca data kelahiran dari Supabase dan menyusun otomatis, input manual dilarang.
Layer B: Fusi Bukti Tiga Lapis — Pencarian vektor Qdrant + ekspansi graf Neo4j + slicing KB yang tepat, memastikan setiap klaim memiliki dukungan literatur.
Layer C: Generasi Berbantuan AI — Claude Sonnet 4.5 menghasilkan draf interpretasi bahasa jelas mengikuti spesifikasi HTML 22-blok, untuk ditinjau manusia.
Layer D: Validasi Otomatis117 aturan keras astrologi (kombinasi Empat Transformasi yang mustahil, kondisi pola, serta tingkat kekuatan bintang) memblokir kesalahan secara otomatis.
Layer E: Tinjauan Manusia — Peneliti astrologi meninjau lalu menulis ke Supabase; draf yang tidak layak dikembalikan.

3.2 Pipeline Produksi Artikel

Pemilihan Topik — startup-check.js menganalisis celah dan memprioritaskan kombinasi 14 bintang utama × 12 istana yang belum tercakup.
Penulisan Berbantuan AI — Draf dihasilkan sesuai 19 paket keterampilan editorial berdasarkan slicing KB yang tepat.
Validasi Mutu — Checklist otomatis 232 butir enam dimensi (struktur HTML / SEO / Schema / tautan internal / terjemahan / iklan).
Audit Gabungan 4 AI — Claude / OpenAI / Anthropic / Google Gemini governance references memberikan suara; perbaikan diterapkan bila mayoritas FIX.
Verifikasi Integritas SHA256 — Setiap artikel menghitung hash konten untuk memastikan integritas setelah publikasi.

4. Mekanisme Jaminan Mutu

4.1 Model Mutu Loop Tertutup Enam Lapis

  1. L1 Lapis Output: 232 validasi per artikel; kegagalan memblokir publikasi.
  2. L2 Lapis Kesalahan: log kegagalan → ≥3 kekambuhan mengajukan aturan baru otomatis.
  3. L3 Lapis Kinerja: umpan balik trafik GA4 + Cloudflare mengidentifikasi artikel yang perlu disegarkan.
  4. L4 Lapis Meta-Aturan: rule-audit.js mengaudit sistem aturan sendiri, memensiunkan aturan tak terpicu dalam 90 hari.
  5. L5 Lapis Lingkungan: header keamanan, kerentanan dependensi, dan masa kedaluwarsa kredensial dipantau otomatis.
  6. L6 Lapis Strategi: tinjauan strategis triwulanan terhadap lanskap kompetitif.

4.2 Metrik Mutu Utama

Aturan Keras Astrologi117 (41 aturan Empat Transformasi + 49 aturan pola + 17 indikator inti + 10 meta-aturan)
Modul Editorial19 paket keterampilan (prompts/skills/)
Kamus Terminologi221 istilah × 9 bahasa (glossary.json)
Pustaka Kasus435 kasus astrologi (dianonimkan + terverifikasi)
Validasi OtomatisChecklist 232 butir (sop-checklist.md)

5. Batasan dan Ambang yang Diketahui

5.1 Batasan Pengetahuan

5.2 Risiko Asistensi AI yang Diketahui

6. Tata Kelola dan Pembaruan

Pengawas Manusiamychenan (pemilik situs, peneliti astrologi)
Kolaborator AIClaude Sonnet 4.5 × 20 (Anthropic)
Audit GabunganPer batch: pemungutan suara Anthropic + OpenAI + Google Gemini governance benchmarks
Siklus PembaruanKartu Sistem diperbarui triwulanan; perubahan kapabilitas besar memicu pembaruan segera.
Dokumen PublikMetodologi / Kartu Model / Benchmark / Pernyataan Etika
Dokumen Tata KelolaDokumen Tata Kelola / Log Transparansi

Kontak: Instagram @mychenan

Standar eksternal dan sumber primer

Sumber primer berikut menjadi acuan halaman ini. Ini adalah tolok ukur, bukan dukungan pihak ketiga terhadap situs ini.

Current Machine Audit Snapshot

This block uses only traceable local audit data. No unsupported metrics or model claims are added.

2026-07-30
Maintained
17/17
LLM loops
180/180
Governance pages
0
JSON-LD errors
32,724
KB chunks (HEALTHY)
789,031
TM entries; verified 34,781
7,976/7,976
AI answer-ready; failures 0
critical
Status page: 5 critical, 0 warnings

Content Maintenance And Update Decision

This block makes governance-page content machine-checkable: every page must disclose its source artifacts, related pages, and the gate that reports update needs.

Update Decision

This is not static copy. When source artifacts, related policies, public metrics, or generators change, AI Ops reports evidence and an AI agent decides whether the page needs edits.

Human Boundary

Systems detect, report, and preserve machine-readable evidence. Codex/Claude agents perform final judgment and repair.

Verification Command

node scripts/verify-trust-pages.js --check

Verifiable Evidence Layer

This block is not a narrative claim. Each core assertion has a claim id, source JSON, hash, and a repeatable verification command. Public pages disclose governance evidence without exposing source code, secrets, private data, or exploitable attack details.

Claim IDVerifiable valueStatusOwnerSource and verification
claim.public-url-manifest.indexable-count
Public URL and canonical inventory
38,965 indexable URLs verified sitewide node scripts/generate-public-evidence-manifest.js --dry
claim.trust-pages.audit-pass-rate
Trust page machine audit
180/180 pass verified sitewide node scripts/verify-trust-pages.js --check
claim.discovery-surface.zero-errors
AI discovery surface audit
{"errors":0,"warnings":0} verified sitewide node scripts/verify-discovery-surface.js
claim.structured-data.jsonld-errors
JSON-LD / structured data audit
{"structured_data_invalid_files":0,"breadcrumb_count":28274,"faq_count":27506,"dataset_count":30,"article_count":27406} verified sitewide node scripts/site-machine-audit.js
claim.status.sla-state
Status page SLA source
critical / 5 critical, 0 warnings verified sitewide node scripts/generate-status-page.js
claim.provider-alignment.openai-anthropic-gemini
OpenAI / Anthropic / Google Gemini benchmark alignment
benchmark alignment only unless code/config evidence exists verified sitewide node scripts/verify-public-evidence.js --check
claim.transparency-report.sha256
Transparency report SHA-256 anchor
{"report":"transparency/report-2026-Q3.json","sha256":"47b09e2ca4e8b8fe9dffdfaccef3b11212de9ee3a8a14badca8044e2481203c5"} verified sitewide node scripts/update-transparency-current-data.js
claim.release-integrity.gpg-signing
GPG signing status
GPG signing configured locally; GitHub verification pending github_verification_pending sitewide gpg --list-secret-keys --keyid-format=long && git log -1 --show-signature
claim.system-card.production-model-evidence
Production model setting source scan
{"productionModelEvidence":[]} verified system-card node scripts/verify-public-evidence.js --check
claim.system-card.quality-gates
System card machine quality gates
{"trustPages":{"pages":180,"pass":180,"fail":0},"discovery":{"errors":0,"warnings":0},"structuredData":{"structured_data_invalid_files":0,"breadcrumb_count":28274,"faq_count":27506 verified system-card node scripts/verify-trust-pages.js --check && node scripts/verify-discovery-surface.js
claim.system-card.kb-tm-lineage
KB / TM source lineage
{"kb":{"source_files":3238,"chunks":32724,"chunked_source_files":3238,"excluded_source_files":0,"missing_chunk_coverage":0,"orphan_chunks":0},"tm":{"total_entries":789031,"counts": verified system-card node scripts/verify-public-evidence.js --check
claim.system-card.provider-benchmark-scope
Provider benchmark scope separated from production usage
{"benchmarkProviders":["OpenAI","Anthropic","Google Gemini"],"productionModelEvidence":[]} verified system-card node scripts/verify-public-evidence.js --check

System Card V2.0: Technical Transparency Layer

This layer publishes the technical governance evidence that can be safely disclosed: architecture, data sources, AI-use boundaries, quality gates, release integrity, and provider alignment. Source code, secrets, exploitable attack details, and private data remain out of scope.

Public architecture

Cloudflare Pages/Workers, R2/D1/KV/Pagefind, and local generation scripts form the public-site and governance publication chain. Public pages disclose behavior, state, and traceable sources, not secrets or internal permissions.

AI-use disclosure

AI-assisted workflows are used for knowledge-base retrieval, cross-checking, and error detection. Governance documents are benchmarked against OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google Gemini public frameworks. Production model usage is disclosed only when code/config evidence exists.

Quality and safety gates

Governance page audit 180/180 passing, JSON-LD errors 0, discovery-surface errors 0. Status pages report critical / 5 critical, 0 warnings as-is.

Data traceability

Knowledge base 32,724 chunks, TM 789,031 entries, AI answer-ready 7,976/7,976. Public metrics trace to data/state-machine/*, data/*audit*.json, and transparency reports.

Governance areaOpenAIAnthropicGoogle GeminiStarnum implementation evidence
Model/system-card disclosureOpenAI models + safety docsClaude model docs + system/model cardsGemini model docs + safety settingssystem-card, model-card, methodology, benchmark, transparency-log
Safety evaluation and use boundariesSafety best practices / deployment checklistResponsible Scaling / safety policyGemini safety controls / policyAI safety, acceptable-use, ethics, risk-boundary copy, crawler policy audit
Data governanceData controls / privacy controlsprivacy and data handling docsGemini API data governance referencesprivacy, ai-data-governance, KB/TM source tracking, SHA-256 hashes
Monitoring and releaseproduction checklist / eval disciplinesystem-card transparency disciplinemodel/version documentation disciplinedeploy.js, status.html, SLA report, trust-pages-machine-audit, sitemap/hreflang audits

The V2.0 goal is not more claims; it separates implemented controls from planned controls. Production usage, benchmark alignment, status exceptions, GPG signing, and SLA breaches are disclosed from source data.

Release Integrity And GPG

GPG signing configured locally. signingkey=0934DFA0EDA6363A. GitHub verification pending until the public key upload and Verified badge are confirmed.

OpenAI / Anthropic / Google Gemini Alignment

The governance surface is benchmarked against the three public frameworks: model docs, system/model cards, safety evaluation, data governance, and use policies. This is benchmark alignment, not a claim that every provider is active in production inference. Official docs checked: 2026-07-30

ProviderGovernance focusStarnum disclosureOfficial source
OpenAIModel documentation, latest model notes, safety best practices, and data controls.No verifiable production model setting was found in the production code scan; providers are listed as governance benchmarks.https://platform.openai.com/docs/models
AnthropicClaude model documentation, system/model cards, Responsible Scaling, and safety policy.No verifiable production model setting was found in the production code scan; providers are listed as governance benchmarks.https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/about-claude/models
Google GeminiGemini API model documentation, safety settings, data governance, and platform policy.No verifiable production model setting was found in the production code scan; providers are listed as governance benchmarks.https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/models