Pernyataan Etika
Ethics Statement v2.0Version 2.0 · · Governance 2.0 public evidence surface
Governance 2.0 Overview
This page is part of the starnum public Governance 2.0 surface and uses the same evidence layer as the system card, data governance, transparency report, use policy, and security policy.
Governance Summary
This page states the ethical commitments behind astrology analysis, AI assistance, and public communication.
Scope
User autonomy, anti-deterministic language, non-discrimination, vulnerable-user boundaries, and transparent correction practices.
Implementation Status
Version 2.0 connects ethical claims to repeatable audit data instead of leaving them as static principles.
starnum.com.tw menggabungkan pengetahuan budaya astrologi dengan teknologi AI moden. Kami sedar gabungan ini membawa tanggungjawab yang sebenar, maka kami berjanji untuk mengekalkan ketelusan, kebertanggungjawaban, serta mengutamakan kesejahteraan pengguna sepanjang proses. Pernyataan ini menerangkan pendirian etika kami dan mekanisme praktikal di sebalik analisis astrologi dibantu AI.
1. Prinsip Etika Teras
2. Komitmen Khusus Berkaitan Penggunaan AI
| Komitmen | Pelaksanaan |
|---|---|
| AI tidak menyamar sebagai manusia | Semua kandungan yang dihasilkan dengan bantuan AI dilabelkan; halaman pembacaan bahasa mudah menerangkan aliran analisis secara eksplisit |
| Pengesahan silang pelbagai model | Logik astrologi disahkan secara automatik oleh 117 peraturan ketat; audit bersama rujukan tadbir urus AI berbilang penyedia menyisih bias sistemik |
| Perlindungan bias | Pandangan bukan aliran Lu Binzhao dalam pangkalan pengetahuan ditanda dengan ⚠️ untuk mengelakkan penyebaran bias aliran yang tidak diisytiharkan |
| Larangan kandungan menakutkan | Penapis kata larangan secara automatik menyekat bahasa ancaman seperti "pasti ada bencana" atau "mesti segera mengubah nasib" |
| Reka bentuk melindungi privasi | Penyediaan carta tidak memerlukan nama sebenar; data kelahiran kekal dalam storan terlindung; carian awam dihentikan selepas tamat tempoh atau penyingkiran pengguna |
| Kebolehjelasan | Setiap pembacaan boleh dijejaki sehingga sumber KB tertentu, menyokong pengesahan balik |
3. Perkara Yang Tidak Menepati Piawaian Etika Platform Ini
- Meramal peristiwa negatif yang spesifik seperti kematian, penyakit, atau jenayah
- Memberi analisis carta individu kepada kanak-kanak bawah umur tanpa kebenaran penjaga
- Menggunakan maklumat astrologi untuk sebarang bentuk diskriminasi
- Menyamarkan hasil yang dijana AI sebagai wawasan peribadi "tukang tilik sakti"
- Mengeksploitasi astrologi untuk menanam kebergantungan psikologi demi mewajarkan caj yang tinggi
- Menerbitkan kritikan berdasarkan carta terhadap tokoh politik atau individu kontroversi
4. Mekanisme Penambahbaikan Diri
Kami mengendalikan sistem penambahbaikan kualiti gelung tertutup untuk memastikan piawaian etika sentiasa dikuatkuasakan:
- Log kegagalan (failure-log.json): apabila masalah sejenis berulang 3 kali atau lebih, peraturan baharu dicadangkan secara automatik
- Audit bersama rujukan tadbir urus AI berbilang penyedia: Anthropic / OpenAI / Google Gemini governance benchmarks mesti mengundi untuk mengesahkan isu kualiti sebelum pembetulan dilakukan
- Semakan etika bebas: dalam semakan lima jabatan setiap hari Isnin, jabatan etika memegang kuasa veto tertinggi
- Keutamaan penyelesaian konflik: Etika > kualiti kandungan > logik astrologi > SEO > teknikal
5. Keselarasan dengan Rangka Kerja Etika Antarabangsa
Rangka kerja etika kami merujuk kepada piawaian antarabangsa berikut:
- Anthropic Responsible Scaling Policy: pengawasan manusia, ketelusan, perlindungan terhadap penggunaan berbahaya
- EU AI Act (draf): syarat semakan manusia bagi sistem AI berisiko tinggi
- Prinsip Partnership on AI: keadilan dan kebolehjejakan sistem AI
Analisis astrologi bukan sistem AI berisiko tinggi (tidak mempengaruhi keputusan perubatan, pekerjaan, atau kredit), namun begitu kami memilih untuk tetap menerapkan piawaian ketelusan yang sama ketatnya.
6. Pendedahan Konflik Kepentingan (Conflict of Interest Disclosure)
Keterbukaan merupakan nilai teras laman ini, maka kami mendedahkan hubungan kepentingan berikut dengan jelas agar pengguna dapat menilai sendiri keobjektifan kandungan:
- Tujuan komersial: starnum.com.tw adalah laman yang bertujuan komersial, dan pemiliknya mempunyai kepentingan kewangan secara langsung terhadap trafik serta kedudukan laman. Ini mungkin mempengaruhi keutamaan topik, tetapi tidak menjejaskan ketepatan kandungan astrologi (logik astrologi disahkan secara automatik oleh peraturan ketat, tanpa kaitan dengan kepentingan komersial).
- Kebergantungan pada alat AI: laman ini menggunakan Anthropic Claude API sebagai teknologi teras. Kami tidak mempunyai kerjasama komersial atau hubungan gabungan dengan Anthropic atau mana-mana syarikat AI lain; kos adalah pengebilan API standard.
- Pendirian aliran astrologi: laman ini secara jelas menerima pakai aliran Lu Binzhao (aliran Zhongzhou) dan bersikap neutral terhadap aliran lain (Wang Tingzhi, Qintian Si Hua), tanpa memperkecil mana-mana aliran.
- Tiada kandungan tajaan: kami tidak menerima penempatan promosi berbayar bagi perkhidmatan atau produk berkaitan astrologi; iklan adalah daripada rangkaian iklan pihak ketiga (tidak mempengaruhi pemilihan kandungan).
- Tiada pembiayaan luar: tiada pelabur luar, tiada dana institusi, tiada bantuan kerajaan. Dikendalikan sepenuhnya oleh individu.
Pendedahan ini merujuk bahagian COI OpenAI Charter, amalan pendedahan Anthropic Long-Term Benefit Trust, dan piawaian pernyataan konflik kepentingan artikel akademik.
7. Hubungi Kami
Jika anda mempunyai soalan atau kebimbangan berkaitan pernyataan etika ini atau cara laman ini menggunakan AI, sila hubungi:
- Pertanyaan umum dan kebimbangan etika: Instagram @mychenan
- Laporan isu: hubungi melalui Instagram @mychenan (kesilapan kandungan, isu fungsi, kebimbangan privasi)
Piawaian luaran dan sumber primer
Sumber primer ini memaklumkan halaman ini. Ia ialah penanda aras, bukan sokongan pihak ketiga terhadap laman ini.
Current Machine Audit Snapshot
This block uses only traceable local audit data. No unsupported metrics or model claims are added.
- data/state-machine/i18n-parity.json: 8,036 parent URLs, 7,976 articles.
- data/kb-machine-audit.json: 3,238 source files, 0 missing coverage, 0 orphan chunks.
- data/discovery-surface-audit.json: 0 errors, 0 warnings.
- data/sla-report.json: critical / 5 critical, 0 warnings.
Content Maintenance And Update Decision
This block makes governance-page content machine-checkable: every page must disclose its source artifacts, related pages, and the gate that reports update needs.
Update Decision
This is not static copy. When source artifacts, related policies, public metrics, or generators change, AI Ops reports evidence and an AI agent decides whether the page needs edits.
Human Boundary
Systems detect, report, and preserve machine-readable evidence. Codex/Claude agents perform final judgment and repair.
Verification Command
node scripts/verify-trust-pages.js --check
data/public-claim-registry.jsondata/ai-answer-readiness-audit.jsondata/state-machine/trust-pages.json- Related governance pages: Responsible AI · Acceptable Use Policy · Privacy Policy · AI Safety
- Update flow:
npm run update:trust-pages→npm run test:trust
Verifiable Evidence Layer
This block is not a narrative claim. Each core assertion has a claim id, source JSON, hash, and a repeatable verification command. Public pages disclose governance evidence without exposing source code, secrets, private data, or exploitable attack details.
| Claim ID | Verifiable value | Status | Owner | Source and verification |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| claim.public-url-manifest.indexable-count Public URL and canonical inventory |
38,965 indexable URLs | verified | sitewide | node scripts/generate-public-evidence-manifest.js --dry |
| claim.trust-pages.audit-pass-rate Trust page machine audit |
180/180 pass | verified | sitewide | node scripts/verify-trust-pages.js --check |
| claim.discovery-surface.zero-errors AI discovery surface audit |
{"errors":0,"warnings":0} | verified | sitewide | node scripts/verify-discovery-surface.js |
| claim.structured-data.jsonld-errors JSON-LD / structured data audit |
{"structured_data_invalid_files":0,"breadcrumb_count":28274,"faq_count":27506,"dataset_count":30,"article_count":27406} | verified | sitewide | node scripts/site-machine-audit.js |
| claim.status.sla-state Status page SLA source |
critical / 5 critical, 0 warnings | verified | sitewide | node scripts/generate-status-page.js |
| claim.provider-alignment.openai-anthropic-gemini OpenAI / Anthropic / Google Gemini benchmark alignment |
benchmark alignment only unless code/config evidence exists | verified | sitewide | node scripts/verify-public-evidence.js --check |
| claim.transparency-report.sha256 Transparency report SHA-256 anchor |
{"report":"transparency/report-2026-Q3.json","sha256":"47b09e2ca4e8b8fe9dffdfaccef3b11212de9ee3a8a14badca8044e2481203c5"} | verified | sitewide | node scripts/update-transparency-current-data.js |
| claim.release-integrity.gpg-signing GPG signing status |
GPG signing configured locally; GitHub verification pending | github_verification_pending | sitewide | gpg --list-secret-keys --keyid-format=long && git log -1 --show-signature |
System Card V2.0: Technical Transparency Layer
This layer publishes the technical governance evidence that can be safely disclosed: architecture, data sources, AI-use boundaries, quality gates, release integrity, and provider alignment. Source code, secrets, exploitable attack details, and private data remain out of scope.
Public architecture
Cloudflare Pages/Workers, R2/D1/KV/Pagefind, and local generation scripts form the public-site and governance publication chain. Public pages disclose behavior, state, and traceable sources, not secrets or internal permissions.
AI-use disclosure
AI-assisted workflows are used for knowledge-base retrieval, cross-checking, and error detection. Governance documents are benchmarked against OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google Gemini public frameworks. Production model usage is disclosed only when code/config evidence exists.
Quality and safety gates
Governance page audit 180/180 passing, JSON-LD errors 0, discovery-surface errors 0. Status pages report critical / 5 critical, 0 warnings as-is.
Data traceability
Knowledge base 32,724 chunks, TM 789,031 entries, AI answer-ready 7,976/7,976. Public metrics trace to data/state-machine/*, data/*audit*.json, and transparency reports.
| Governance area | OpenAI | Anthropic | Google Gemini | Starnum implementation evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model/system-card disclosure | OpenAI models + safety docs | Claude model docs + system/model cards | Gemini model docs + safety settings | system-card, model-card, methodology, benchmark, transparency-log |
| Safety evaluation and use boundaries | Safety best practices / deployment checklist | Responsible Scaling / safety policy | Gemini safety controls / policy | AI safety, acceptable-use, ethics, risk-boundary copy, crawler policy audit |
| Data governance | Data controls / privacy controls | privacy and data handling docs | Gemini API data governance references | privacy, ai-data-governance, KB/TM source tracking, SHA-256 hashes |
| Monitoring and release | production checklist / eval discipline | system-card transparency discipline | model/version documentation discipline | deploy.js, status.html, SLA report, trust-pages-machine-audit, sitemap/hreflang audits |
- Sources: data/state-machine/model-card.json, public-bench.json, trust-pages.json, security-headers.json.
- Sources: data/trust-pages-machine-audit.json, data/discovery-surface-audit.json, data/ai-answer-readiness-audit.json.
- Sources: data/kb-machine-audit.json, data/tm/quality-audit-report.json, data/sla-report.json.
- Official benchmark docs checked: 2026-07-30; links are listed in the OpenAI / Anthropic / Google Gemini alignment table.
The V2.0 goal is not more claims; it separates implemented controls from planned controls. Production usage, benchmark alignment, status exceptions, GPG signing, and SLA breaches are disclosed from source data.
Release Integrity And GPG
GPG signing configured locally. signingkey=0934DFA0EDA6363A. GitHub verification pending until the public key upload and Verified badge are confirmed.
OpenAI / Anthropic / Google Gemini Alignment
The governance surface is benchmarked against the three public frameworks: model docs, system/model cards, safety evaluation, data governance, and use policies. This is benchmark alignment, not a claim that every provider is active in production inference. Official docs checked: 2026-07-30
| Provider | Governance focus | Starnum disclosure | Official source |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenAI | Model documentation, latest model notes, safety best practices, and data controls. | No verifiable production model setting was found in the production code scan; providers are listed as governance benchmarks. | https://platform.openai.com/docs/models |
| Anthropic | Claude model documentation, system/model cards, Responsible Scaling, and safety policy. | No verifiable production model setting was found in the production code scan; providers are listed as governance benchmarks. | https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/about-claude/models |
| Google Gemini | Gemini API model documentation, safety settings, data governance, and platform policy. | No verifiable production model setting was found in the production code scan; providers are listed as governance benchmarks. | https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/models |