← starnum.com.tw

Kad Sistem

System Card v2.0

Version 2.0 · · Governance 2.0 public evidence surface

Governance 2.0 Overview

This page is part of the starnum public Governance 2.0 surface and uses the same evidence layer as the system card, data governance, transparency report, use policy, and security policy.

Governance Summary

This page is the canonical public system disclosure for platform behavior, model/provider boundaries, and evidence-backed governance.

Scope

System behavior, AI assistance boundaries, public claims, governance metrics, provider alignment, and release integrity.

Implementation Status

Version 2.0 is the source structure used to align the other public governance pages.

AI-Assisted Astrology Platform

Versi 1.0 · · Dirujuk pada rangka kerja Anthropic System Card

Kad Sistem ini memperluas Kad Model dan menerangkan keupayaan sistem keseluruhan starnum.com.tw, infrastruktur pangkalan pengetahuan, saluran paip berbantukan AI, mekanisme jaminan kualiti dan batasan yang diketahui.

1. Gambaran Sistem

Nama PlatformStarnum Platform
Versiv5.0 (2026-04-12)
Ciri UtamaAnalisis carta Zi Wei Dou Shu, kiraan Numerologi (Life Path), artikel pangkalan pengetahuan astrologi
Khalayak SasaranPeminat metafizik Timur tradisional; pengguna Cina Tradisional dan pelbagai bahasa
Sistem PengetahuanZi Wei: aliran Lu Binzhao (Zhongzhou) San-He + Si-Hua; Numerologi: sistem Pythagoras
Enjin Cartaiztro v3.x (sumber terbuka, boleh disahkan di GitHub)
Model AIClaude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic) — penjanaan berbantu, semakan manusia
Sokongan Bahasa10 bahasa (zh-TW / zh-CN / en / ja / ko / es / vi / th / ms / id)
InfrastrukturCloudflare Pages + Workers + Supabase (PostgreSQL)

2. Infrastruktur Pangkalan Pengetahuan

2.1 Skala

KB Zi Wei Dou Shu225+ fail, 88 indeks, struktur 8 jilid (01-asas ~ 09-lanjutan)
KB Numerologi141 fail ~56,544 baris
KB Keseluruhan2,758 fail ~1,537,711+ baris teks berstruktur
Indeks VektorPangkalan data vektor semantik berskala besar (Qdrant)
Graf PengetahuanGraf pengetahuan (Neo4j, bintang × istana × Si-Hua)

2.2 Gred Kualiti Pengetahuan

2.3 Mekanisme Integriti Aliran

Pandangan Si-Hua bukan aliran Lu Binzhao dilabel ⚠️ Bukan Lu Binzhao. KB mengekalkan senarai sekat untuk menghalang pemerangkapan semula sumber yang dikesan prompt injection.

3. Saluran Paip Berbantukan AI

3.1 Saluran Analisis Carta dalam Bahasa Mudah

Layer A: Pembinaan Carta — Enjin sumber terbuka iztro membaca data kelahiran dari Supabase dan membina carta automatik; input manual dilarang.
Layer B: Gabungan Bukti Tiga Lapis — Carian vektor Qdrant + pengembangan graf Neo4j + pemotongan KB tepat, memastikan setiap dakwaan disokong literatur.
Layer C: Penjanaan Berbantukan AI — Claude Sonnet 4.5 menjana draf tafsiran bahasa mudah mengikut spesifikasi HTML 22-blok untuk semakan manusia.
Layer D: Pengesahan Automatik117 peraturan keras astrologi (peristiwa mustahil Si-Hua, syarat corak, kekuatan bintang) menyekat ralat secara automatik.
Layer E: Semakan Manusia — Penyelidik astrologi menyemak kemudian menulis ke Supabase; draf tidak memenuhi piawai dikembalikan.

3.2 Saluran Penghasilan Artikel

Pilihan Topik — startup-check.js menganalisis jurang dan mengutamakan kombinasi 14 bintang utama × 12 istana yang belum diliputi.
Penulisan Berbantukan AI — Draf dijana mengikut 19 pakej kemahiran editorial berdasarkan pemotongan KB tepat.
Pengesahan Kualiti — Senarai semak automatik 232 item enam dimensi (struktur HTML / SEO / Schema / pautan dalaman / terjemahan / iklan).
Audit Bersama 4 AI — Claude / OpenAI / Anthropic / Google Gemini governance references mengundi; pembetulan dikenakan apabila majoriti FIX.
Pengesahan Integriti SHA256 — Setiap artikel mengira cincang kandungan bagi memastikan integriti selepas penerbitan.

4. Mekanisme Jaminan Kualiti

4.1 Model Kualiti Gelung Tertutup Enam Lapis

  1. L1 Lapis Output: 232 pengesahan setiap artikel; kegagalan menyekat penerbitan.
  2. L2 Lapis Ralat: log kegagalan → ≥3 kali berulang mencadangkan peraturan baru secara automatik.
  3. L3 Lapis Prestasi: maklum balas trafik GA4 + Cloudflare mengenal pasti artikel yang perlu disegarkan.
  4. L4 Lapis Meta-Peraturan: rule-audit.js mengaudit sistem peraturan itu sendiri dan menyingkirkan peraturan tidak dicetuskan dalam 90 hari.
  5. L5 Lapis Persekitaran: pengepala keselamatan, kerentanan kebergantungan, dan tamat tempoh kelayakan dipantau secara automatik.
  6. L6 Lapis Strategi: semakan strategik setiap suku tahun berbanding landskap kompetitif.

4.2 Metrik Kualiti Utama

Peraturan Keras Astrologi117 (41 Empat Transformasi + 49 corak + 17 penunjuk teras + 10 peraturan meta)
Modul Editorial19 pakej kemahiran (prompts/skills/)
Kamus Terminologi221 istilah × 9 bahasa (glossary.json)
Pustaka Kes435 kes astrologi (dianonimkan + disahkan)
Pengesahan Kualiti AutomatikSenarai semak 232 item (sop-checklist.md)

5. Batasan dan Sempadan Diketahui

5.1 Batasan Pengetahuan

5.2 Risiko Bantuan AI yang Diketahui

6. Tadbir Urus dan Kemas Kini

Penyelia Manusiamychenan (pemilik laman, penyelidik astrologi)
Kolaborator AIClaude Sonnet 4.5 × 20 (Anthropic)
Audit BersamaSetiap kelompok: undian Anthropic + OpenAI + Google Gemini governance benchmarks
Kitaran Kemas KiniKad Sistem dikemas kini setiap suku tahun; perubahan keupayaan utama mencetus kemas kini serta-merta.
Dokumen AwamMetodologi / Kad Model / Benchmark / Kenyataan Etika
Dokumen Tadbir UrusDokumen Tadbir Urus / Pelan Pembangunan

Hubungi: Instagram @mychenan

Piawaian luaran dan sumber primer

Sumber primer ini memaklumkan halaman ini. Ia ialah penanda aras, bukan sokongan pihak ketiga terhadap laman ini.

Current Machine Audit Snapshot

This block uses only traceable local audit data. No unsupported metrics or model claims are added.

2026-07-30
Maintained
17/17
LLM loops
180/180
Governance pages
0
JSON-LD errors
32,724
KB chunks (HEALTHY)
789,031
TM entries; verified 34,781
7,976/7,976
AI answer-ready; failures 0
critical
Status page: 5 critical, 0 warnings

Content Maintenance And Update Decision

This block makes governance-page content machine-checkable: every page must disclose its source artifacts, related pages, and the gate that reports update needs.

Update Decision

This is not static copy. When source artifacts, related policies, public metrics, or generators change, AI Ops reports evidence and an AI agent decides whether the page needs edits.

Human Boundary

Systems detect, report, and preserve machine-readable evidence. Codex/Claude agents perform final judgment and repair.

Verification Command

node scripts/verify-trust-pages.js --check

Verifiable Evidence Layer

This block is not a narrative claim. Each core assertion has a claim id, source JSON, hash, and a repeatable verification command. Public pages disclose governance evidence without exposing source code, secrets, private data, or exploitable attack details.

Claim IDVerifiable valueStatusOwnerSource and verification
claim.public-url-manifest.indexable-count
Public URL and canonical inventory
38,965 indexable URLs verified sitewide node scripts/generate-public-evidence-manifest.js --dry
claim.trust-pages.audit-pass-rate
Trust page machine audit
180/180 pass verified sitewide node scripts/verify-trust-pages.js --check
claim.discovery-surface.zero-errors
AI discovery surface audit
{"errors":0,"warnings":0} verified sitewide node scripts/verify-discovery-surface.js
claim.structured-data.jsonld-errors
JSON-LD / structured data audit
{"structured_data_invalid_files":0,"breadcrumb_count":28274,"faq_count":27506,"dataset_count":30,"article_count":27406} verified sitewide node scripts/site-machine-audit.js
claim.status.sla-state
Status page SLA source
critical / 5 critical, 0 warnings verified sitewide node scripts/generate-status-page.js
claim.provider-alignment.openai-anthropic-gemini
OpenAI / Anthropic / Google Gemini benchmark alignment
benchmark alignment only unless code/config evidence exists verified sitewide node scripts/verify-public-evidence.js --check
claim.transparency-report.sha256
Transparency report SHA-256 anchor
{"report":"transparency/report-2026-Q3.json","sha256":"47b09e2ca4e8b8fe9dffdfaccef3b11212de9ee3a8a14badca8044e2481203c5"} verified sitewide node scripts/update-transparency-current-data.js
claim.release-integrity.gpg-signing
GPG signing status
GPG signing configured locally; GitHub verification pending github_verification_pending sitewide gpg --list-secret-keys --keyid-format=long && git log -1 --show-signature
claim.system-card.production-model-evidence
Production model setting source scan
{"productionModelEvidence":[]} verified system-card node scripts/verify-public-evidence.js --check
claim.system-card.quality-gates
System card machine quality gates
{"trustPages":{"pages":180,"pass":180,"fail":0},"discovery":{"errors":0,"warnings":0},"structuredData":{"structured_data_invalid_files":0,"breadcrumb_count":28274,"faq_count":27506 verified system-card node scripts/verify-trust-pages.js --check && node scripts/verify-discovery-surface.js
claim.system-card.kb-tm-lineage
KB / TM source lineage
{"kb":{"source_files":3238,"chunks":32724,"chunked_source_files":3238,"excluded_source_files":0,"missing_chunk_coverage":0,"orphan_chunks":0},"tm":{"total_entries":789031,"counts": verified system-card node scripts/verify-public-evidence.js --check
claim.system-card.provider-benchmark-scope
Provider benchmark scope separated from production usage
{"benchmarkProviders":["OpenAI","Anthropic","Google Gemini"],"productionModelEvidence":[]} verified system-card node scripts/verify-public-evidence.js --check

System Card V2.0: Technical Transparency Layer

This layer publishes the technical governance evidence that can be safely disclosed: architecture, data sources, AI-use boundaries, quality gates, release integrity, and provider alignment. Source code, secrets, exploitable attack details, and private data remain out of scope.

Public architecture

Cloudflare Pages/Workers, R2/D1/KV/Pagefind, and local generation scripts form the public-site and governance publication chain. Public pages disclose behavior, state, and traceable sources, not secrets or internal permissions.

AI-use disclosure

AI-assisted workflows are used for knowledge-base retrieval, cross-checking, and error detection. Governance documents are benchmarked against OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google Gemini public frameworks. Production model usage is disclosed only when code/config evidence exists.

Quality and safety gates

Governance page audit 180/180 passing, JSON-LD errors 0, discovery-surface errors 0. Status pages report critical / 5 critical, 0 warnings as-is.

Data traceability

Knowledge base 32,724 chunks, TM 789,031 entries, AI answer-ready 7,976/7,976. Public metrics trace to data/state-machine/*, data/*audit*.json, and transparency reports.

Governance areaOpenAIAnthropicGoogle GeminiStarnum implementation evidence
Model/system-card disclosureOpenAI models + safety docsClaude model docs + system/model cardsGemini model docs + safety settingssystem-card, model-card, methodology, benchmark, transparency-log
Safety evaluation and use boundariesSafety best practices / deployment checklistResponsible Scaling / safety policyGemini safety controls / policyAI safety, acceptable-use, ethics, risk-boundary copy, crawler policy audit
Data governanceData controls / privacy controlsprivacy and data handling docsGemini API data governance referencesprivacy, ai-data-governance, KB/TM source tracking, SHA-256 hashes
Monitoring and releaseproduction checklist / eval disciplinesystem-card transparency disciplinemodel/version documentation disciplinedeploy.js, status.html, SLA report, trust-pages-machine-audit, sitemap/hreflang audits

The V2.0 goal is not more claims; it separates implemented controls from planned controls. Production usage, benchmark alignment, status exceptions, GPG signing, and SLA breaches are disclosed from source data.

Release Integrity And GPG

GPG signing configured locally. signingkey=0934DFA0EDA6363A. GitHub verification pending until the public key upload and Verified badge are confirmed.

OpenAI / Anthropic / Google Gemini Alignment

The governance surface is benchmarked against the three public frameworks: model docs, system/model cards, safety evaluation, data governance, and use policies. This is benchmark alignment, not a claim that every provider is active in production inference. Official docs checked: 2026-07-30

ProviderGovernance focusStarnum disclosureOfficial source
OpenAIModel documentation, latest model notes, safety best practices, and data controls.No verifiable production model setting was found in the production code scan; providers are listed as governance benchmarks.https://platform.openai.com/docs/models
AnthropicClaude model documentation, system/model cards, Responsible Scaling, and safety policy.No verifiable production model setting was found in the production code scan; providers are listed as governance benchmarks.https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/about-claude/models
Google GeminiGemini API model documentation, safety settings, data governance, and platform policy.No verifiable production model setting was found in the production code scan; providers are listed as governance benchmarks.https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/models